3/29/2017 · Our two key arguments are that the notion of ‘hegemonic masculinities’ in conflict-affected situations needs to be re-examined and re-articulated in more nuanced ways, and that the scope of studying masculinities in these situations needs to be broadened to go beyond merely examining the violences of men.
Request PDF | On May 6, 2020, Henri Myrttinen and others published Re -thinking hegemonic masculinities in conflict-affected contexts | Find, read and cite all.
Howson – Re-Thinking Aspiration and Hegemonic Masculinity certainly normative. It embodied the currently most honored way of being a man, it required all other men to position themselves in relation to it, and it ideologically legitimated the global subordination of women to men” [my emphases].
zation of hegemonic masculinities in specific organizations (Cheng 1996; Cockburn 1991) and their role in organizational decision making (Messerschmidt 1995). A particular focus of this research was the military, where specific patterns of hegemonic masculinity had been entrenched but were becoming increasingly problematic (Barrett 1996).
Conceptually, this approach allows a recognition that non- hegemonic masculinities may be dominant in particular contexts and, significantly, these may offer a challenge to hegemonic masculinities …
The concept of hegemonic masculinity has influenced gender studies across many academic fields but has also attracted serious criticism. The authors trace the origin of the concept in a convergence of ideas in the early 1980s and map the ways it was applied when research on men and masculinities expanded.
